Hit – EU Migration Pact information

Eurodac Regulation:
Article 33 – Conditions for access to Eurodac by designated authorities

1. For law enforcement purposes, designated authorities may submit a reasoned electronic request for the comparison of biometric or alphanumeric data with the data stored in Eurodac within the scope of their powers only where all of the following conditions have been met: (a) a prior check has been conducted in: (i) national databases; and […]

Screening Regulation:
Article 16 – Arrangements for identification and security checks

1. The queries provided for in Article 14(2) and in Article 15(2) may be launched using, for queries related to EU information systems, Europol data, Interpol Databases, the in accordance with Chapter II of and with Chapter II of . 2. Where a hit is obtained following a query as provided for in Article 15(2) […]

AMMR:
Article 39 – Submitting a take charge request

1. If the Member State referred to in Article 38(1) considers that another Member State is responsible for examining the application, it shall, immediately and in any event within two months of the date on which the application was registered, request that other Member State to take charge of the applicant. Member States shall prioritise […]

Eurodac Regulation:
Article 34 – Conditions for access to Eurodac by Europol

1. For law enforcement purposes, the Europol designated authority may submit a reasoned electronic request for the comparison of biometric or alphanumeric data with the data stored in Eurodac within the limits of Europol’s mandate and where necessary for the performance of Europol’s tasks only where all of the following conditions have been met: (a) […]

Screening Regulation:
Article 17 – Screening form

1. The screening authorities shall, with regard to the persons referred to in Articles 5 and 7, complete a form containing the following: (a) name, date and place of birth and gender; (b) indication of nationalities or statelessness, countries of residence prior to arrival and languages spoken; (c) the reason for which the screening was […]

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 54

Where necessary, hits should be checked by a trained fingerprint expert in order to ensure the accurate determination of responsibility under , the exact identification of the third-country national or stateless person and the exact identification of the criminal suspect or victim of crime whose data might be stored in Eurodac. Checks by a trained […]

Eurodac Regulation:
Article 36 – Responsibility for data processing

1. The Member State of origin shall be responsible for ensuring that: (a) biometric data and the other data referred to in Article 17(1) and (2), Article 19(1), Article 21(1), Article 22(2) and (3), Article 23(2) and (3), Article 24(2) and (3) and Article 26(2) are taken lawfully and are lawfully transmitted to Eurodac; (b) […]

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 59

Where a third-country national or a stateless person has been refused admission to a Member State on one of the grounds set out in , namely that there were reasonable grounds for considering that third-country national or stateless person as a danger to the community, public policy, security or public health of the Member State […]

Eurodac Regulation:
Article 38 – Carrying out comparisons and transmitting results

1. Member States shall ensure the transmission of biometric data of an appropriate quality for the purposes of comparison by means of the computerised fingerprint and facial recognition system. As far as is necessary to ensure that the results of the comparison by Eurodac reach a very high level of accuracy, shall establish the appropriate […]

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 61

Where a hit is received by a Member State from Eurodac that can assist that Member State in carrying out its obligations necessary for the application of the grounds for refusing admission under , the Member State of origin which had previously refused to admit a third-country national or a stateless person should promptly exchange […]