Skip to content

EU Migration Pact information

A simple site to make the Pact legislation more accessible

Menu
  • Home
    • Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR)
    • Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation
    • Eurodac Regulation
    • Procedures Regulation
    • Return Border Procedure Regulation
    • Qualification Regulation
    • Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Regulation
    • Reception Directive
    • Screening Regulation
  • Advanced Search

Pact instrument: Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 43

When confronted with a situation of crisis or force majeure, it should be possible for the Member State concerned to extend the examination of applications for international protection at the border by six weeks. The extension should not be used in addition to the period referred to in Article 51(2), third subparagraph, of .

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 59

To ensure a sufficient level of preparedness for a situation of crisis, Members States should include in their contingency plans measures needed to respond to and resolve a situation of crisis, including measures needed to overcome challenges in the functioning of the Common European Asylum System and to protect the rights of applicants and beneficiaries […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Article 7 – EU Solidarity coordinator

The EU Solidarity Coordinator, as established by Articles 15 and 60 of shall, in addition to the tasks listed under those Articles: (a) support the relocation activities from the Member State concerned to the contributing Member State under this Regulation; (b) promote a culture of preparedness, cooperation and resilience among Member States in the field […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 12

Mass arrivals of third-country nationals or stateless persons could lead to a situation where a Member State is not in a position to process the applications for international protection of third-country nationals and stateless persons in accordance with the rules set out in and , and that has consequences for the functioning of the asylum […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 28

To ensure a high level of political scrutiny and support and expression of the Union’s solidarity, it is relevant to consider whether the European Council has acknowledged that the Union or one or more of its Member States are facing a situation of instrumentalisation of migrants. The instrumentalisation of migrants is liable to put at […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 44

When faced with a situation of crisis or force majeure, a Member State should be able to request measures from among several options with regard to the application of the border procedure, taking into account the composition of the flows and their diverse nature, depending on the precise situation of crisis.

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 60

Without prejudice to the above and where relevant, in a situation of crisis, all mechanisms for crisis included in the Toolbox should be mobilised, particularly the financial and operational support that Union agencies, Union Funds and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism can provide in accordance with the applicable legal acts. Thereafter, the Commission should, in […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Article 8 – Solidarity and support measures in a situation of crisis

1. A Member State facing a situation of crisis may request the following types of contributions in the reasoned request referred to in Article 2: (a) relocations, to be conducted following the procedures set out in Articles 67 and 68 of : (i) of applicants for international protection; (ii) where bilaterally agreed by the contributing […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 13

Member States should have sufficient human and financial resources and infrastructure to implement asylum and migration management policies effectively. Member States should ensure appropriate coordination between the relevant national authorities as well as with the national authorities of the other Member States to ensure that their asylum, reception, including child protection services, or return system […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 29

In order to provide for an appropriate response that is necessary and proportionate to address the situation, the Commission proposal should identify, where relevant, the specific derogations that Member States should be authorised to apply. In a situation of instrumentalisation, the persons subject to instrumentalisation to whom the relevant derogations could be applied should be […]

Read More »

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 7 8 9 Next

Keywords

Absconding Accelerated Examination Procedure Adequate capacity Annual Solidarity Pool Asylum Border Procedure Beneficiary of temporary protection Best Interests of the Child Biometric data Common Identity Repository (CIR) Crisis/Force Majeure Detention Determining authority Effective Remedy Eurodac Facial image data Family members Fingerprint data Hit Humanitarian admission Identification Identity data Illegal stay Mandatory Solidarity Member State Responsible Migratory pressure Minor Non-Refoulement Refugee status Relocation Remain in the Member State Representative Resettlement Return Border Procedure Safe Country of Origin Safe Third Country Search and rescue operation Secondary Movement Special procedural guarantees Special reception needs Stateless person Subsequent application Subsidiary protection status Transfer Unaccompanied minor Visa

Search

© EU Migration Pact information 2026. Powered by WordPress