Skip to content

EU Migration Pact information

A simple site to make the Pact legislation more accessible

Menu
  • Home
    • Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR)
    • Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation
    • Eurodac Regulation
    • Procedures Regulation
    • Return Border Procedure Regulation
    • Qualification Regulation
    • Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Regulation
    • Reception Directive
    • Screening Regulation
  • Advanced Search

Category: Recitals

Recitals set out the reasons for the contents of the enacting terms

AMMR:
Recital 94

As regards Liechtenstein, Parts III, V and VII of this Regulation constitute acts or measures amending or building upon the provisions of Article 1 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 16

Humanitarian assistance should not be considered as instrumentalisation of migrants when there is no aim to destabilise the Union or a Member State.

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 32

The Council implementing decision should specify, where appropriate, the specific derogations that the Member State facing a situation of crisis, or force majeure is authorised to apply, depending on the nature of each derogation, and set the date from which they could be applied. Moreover, the decision should state the grounds on which it is […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 48

The detention of applicants should be applied in accordance with the underlying principle that a person should not be held in detention for the sole reason that that person is seeking international protection, particularly in accordance with the international legal obligations of the Member States and with Article 31 of the Geneva Convention. In accordance […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 64

In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark annexed to the and to the , Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Given that Articles 12 and 13, and Articles 1 to […]

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 12

Biometrics constitute an important element in establishing the exact identity of the persons falling under the scope of this Regulation because they ensure a high level of accuracy of identification. Therefore, it is necessary to set up a system for the comparison of such persons’ biometric data.

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 28

In the fight against terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences, it is essential for law enforcement authorities to have the fullest and most up-to-date information if they are to perform their tasks. The information contained in Eurodac is necessary for the purposes of the prevention, detection or investigation of terrorist offences as referred to […]

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 44

With a view to strengthening the protection of all children falling under the scope of this Regulation, including unaccompanied minors who have not applied for international protection and children who might become separated from their families, it is also necessary to take biometric data for storage in Eurodac to help establish the identity of children […]

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 60

The transmission of data of persons registered for the purpose of conducting an admission procedure in Eurodac should contribute to limiting the number of Member States that exchange those persons’ personal data during a subsequent admission procedure, and should thus contribute to ensuring compliance with the principle of data minimisation.

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 76

While the non-contractual liability of the Union in connection with the operation of Eurodac is governed by the relevant provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), it is necessary to lay down specific rules for the non-contractual liability of the Member States in connection with the operation of Eurodac.

Read More »

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 59 60 61 … 67 Next

Keywords

Absconding Accelerated Examination Procedure Adequate capacity Annual Solidarity Pool Asylum Border Procedure Beneficiary of temporary protection Best Interests of the Child Biometric data Common Identity Repository (CIR) Crisis/Force Majeure Detention Determining authority Effective Remedy Eurodac Facial image data Family members Fingerprint data Hit Humanitarian admission Identification Identity data Illegal stay Mandatory Solidarity Member State Responsible Migratory pressure Minor Non-Refoulement Refugee status Relocation Remain in the Member State Representative Resettlement Return Border Procedure Safe Country of Origin Safe Third Country Search and rescue operation Secondary Movement Special procedural guarantees Special reception needs Stateless person Subsequent application Subsidiary protection status Transfer Unaccompanied minor Visa

Search

© EU Migration Pact information 2026. Powered by WordPress