Skip to content

EU Migration Pact information

A simple site to make the Pact legislation more accessible

Menu
  • Home
    • Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR)
    • Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation
    • Eurodac Regulation
    • Procedures Regulation
    • Return Border Procedure Regulation
    • Qualification Regulation
    • Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Regulation
    • Reception Directive
    • Screening Regulation
  • Advanced Search

Category: Recitals

Recitals set out the reasons for the contents of the enacting terms

AMMR:
Recital 52

The definition of family member should reflect the reality of current migratory trends, according to which applicants often arrive to the territory of the Member States after a prolonged period of time in transit. The definition should therefore include families formed outside the country of origin, but before their arrival on the territory of the […]

Read More »

AMMR:
Recital 68

In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 (15) , transfers to the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection may be carried out on a voluntary basis, by supervised departure or under escort. Member States should promote voluntary transfers by providing adequate information to the person concerned and should ensure that […]

Read More »

AMMR:
Recital 84

In order to provide for supplementary rules, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the identification of family members, siblings or relatives of an unaccompanied minor; the criteria for establishing the existence of proven family links in respect of unaccompanied minors; the criteria […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 6

This Regulation ensures the effective application of the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility between Member States and the adaptation of the relevant rules on asylum procedure, including the application of the expedited procedure so that the Member States and the Union have the necessary legal tools at their disposal to react swiftly […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 22

The use of measures included in the Permanent EU Migration Support Toolbox as established by Article 6(3) of (the ‘Toolbox’) should not be a precondition to benefit from solidarity measures under this Regulation.

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 38

In contrast to the rules set out in where Member States are not obliged to take responsibility above their fair share, in a situation of crisis, the implementation of the Solidarity Response plan could potentially lead to one or several contributing Member States taking responsibility for examining applications for international protection above their fair share. […]

Read More »

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 54

Where, in accordance with , objective circumstances suggest that applications for international protection from groups of applicants from a specific country of origin or former habitual residence or a part of that country or on the basis of the criteria drawn from that Regulation could be well-founded, it is in the interest of both the […]

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 2

For the purpose of applying of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), it is necessary to establish the identity of applicants for international protection and of persons apprehended in connection with the irregular crossing of the external borders of the Member States. In order to apply that Regulation effectively, it is also desirable […]

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 18

In its communication of 13 May 2015 entitled ‘A European Agenda on Migration’, the Commission noted that Member States must also implement fully the rules on taking migrants’ fingerprints at the borders, and further proposed that it will also explore how more biometric identifiers, such as using facial recognition techniques through digital photos, can be […]

Read More »

Eurodac Regulation:
Recital 34

Although the original purpose of the establishment of Eurodac did not require the possibility of requesting comparisons of data with the database on the basis of a latent fingerprint, which is the dactyloscopic trace which may be found at a crime scene, such a feature is fundamental in the field of police cooperation. The possibility […]

Read More »

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 17 18 19 … 67 Next

Keywords

Absconding Accelerated Examination Procedure Adequate capacity Annual Solidarity Pool Asylum Border Procedure Beneficiary of temporary protection Best Interests of the Child Biometric data Common Identity Repository (CIR) Crisis/Force Majeure Detention Determining authority Effective Remedy Eurodac Facial image data Family members Fingerprint data Hit Humanitarian admission Identification Identity data Illegal stay Mandatory Solidarity Member State Responsible Migratory pressure Minor Non-Refoulement Refugee status Relocation Remain in the Member State Representative Resettlement Return Border Procedure Safe Country of Origin Safe Third Country Search and rescue operation Secondary Movement Special procedural guarantees Special reception needs Stateless person Subsequent application Subsidiary protection status Transfer Unaccompanied minor Visa

Search

© EU Migration Pact information 2026. Powered by WordPress