Skip to content

EU Migration Pact information

A simple site to make the Pact legislation more accessible

Menu
  • Home
    • Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR)
    • Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation
    • Eurodac Regulation
    • Procedures Regulation
    • Return Border Procedure Regulation
    • Qualification Regulation
    • Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Regulation
    • Reception Directive
    • Screening Regulation
  • Advanced Search

Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation:
Recital 49

In a situation of instrumentalisation and to prevent a third country or a hostile non-state actor from targeting specific nationalities or specific categories of third-country nationals or stateless persons, it should be possible for a Member State to derogate from the asylum procedure set out in this Regulation by taking a decision in the framework of the border procedure, as set out in Articles 43 to 54 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348Procedures Regulation on the merits of all applications for international protection. The principles and guarantees set out in that Regulation should be respected. The Council implementing decision authorising the Member State to apply the referred derogations should specify the third-country nationals or stateless persons subject to the situation of instrumentalisation. Where applying this derogation, specific attention should be given to certain categories of third-country nationals and stateless persons who have been subject to instrumentalisation, in particular minors under the age of 12 and their family members, and vulnerable persons with special procedural or special reception needs. Those groups should therefore either be excluded from the border procedure, or, when an individual assessment concludes that their applications are likely to be well-founded, that procedure should cease to apply to them. The choice between those alternatives remains at the discretion of the Member State requesting the application of that derogation. The choice indicated in the request should be reflected in the Council implementing decision authorising the application of this derogation. The broadening of the scope of the border procedure in a situation of instrumentalisation should not affect the grounds and other rules applicable to the mandatory border procedure under Regulation (EU) 2024/1348Procedures Regulation. Where a Member State is authorised to broaden the scope of the border procedure, applications examined under that procedure should not be considered as part of the adequate capacity pursuant to Article 47 or counted for the application of the annual cap pursuant to Article 50 of that Regulation.


Previous
Table of contents
Next
Categories: Recitals Key words: Adequate capacity, Asylum Border Procedure, Crisis/Force Majeure, Family members, Minor, Special procedural guarantees, Special reception needs

Keywords

Absconding Accelerated Examination Procedure Adequate capacity Annual Solidarity Pool Asylum Border Procedure Beneficiary of temporary protection Best Interests of the Child Biometric data Common Identity Repository (CIR) Crisis/Force Majeure Detention Determining authority Effective Remedy Eurodac Facial image data Family members Fingerprint data Hit Humanitarian admission Identification Identity data Illegal stay Mandatory Solidarity Member State Responsible Migratory pressure Minor Non-Refoulement Refugee status Relocation Remain in the Member State Representative Resettlement Return Border Procedure Safe Country of Origin Safe Third Country Search and rescue operation Secondary Movement Special procedural guarantees Special reception needs Stateless person Subsequent application Subsidiary protection status Transfer Unaccompanied minor Visa

Search

© EU Migration Pact information 2026. Powered by WordPress